In general, careful consideration by legislators is necessary when deciding whether a law should be legalized or decriminalized. These individuals would examine the future impact of an action and determine whether or not legalization would bring sufficient benefits. As mentioned earlier, decriminalization reflects the changing views of society on various issues. Usually, society believes that an action has no negative side effects (or is so insignificant that the justice system should not care) and therefore should not continue to be considered criminal. There is an ongoing debate about whether cannabis use impairs people`s ability to work, build relationships with others and/or lead normal lives. Recent research clearly shows that any work that requires cognitive participation and decision-making is influenced by cannabis use.27,28,29,34 In a study of young cannabis users who were mentally and physically healthy, Wadsworth et al28 reported an association between cannabis use and impaired cognitive function and mood, but not with workplace errors (although there is an association with lower alertness and slowerness). Organization of the reaction). Users had working memory problems at the beginning and psychomotor slowdown and weaker episodic memory at the end of the work week. This highlights the importance of the timing of testing in the context and routine of everyday life. In a separate study of the same sample, cannabis use had a significant negative impact on workplace safety (e.g., self-reported accidents), motor vehicle accidents, and minor injuries.34 Those with higher levels of other risk factors associated with accidents and who also used cannabis were more likely to report an accident in the previous year. Therefore, it is possible that the effects of cannabis have been linked to an intensification of other risk factors associated with accidents and injuries.34 The belief behind decriminalization, according to the Biden administration, is that „no one should be imprisoned for using only illegal drugs.“ Instead, federal courts will refer people who use drugs to drug courts so they can get the right treatment to treat their substance use disorder. Biden`s goal is to promote this at the national level so that all states can help addicts get the help and support they deserve.
It is not designed to encourage greater drug use. Proponents of cannabis use argue that smoking cannabis provides relaxation and pleasure, increases well-being, helps reduce stress, and helps cope with the harsh reality. Of course, any improvement in the well-being of a mentally healthy person through the use of a psychoactive substance is a certain oxymoron. In addition, cannabis use decreases cortical dopamine33, which plays an important role in higher cognitive functions, working memory, executive function, etc. Therefore, the „relaxed“ feeling that most cannabis users cite as a desirable acute effect is likely to reflect cognitive blunting („amotivational syndrome“) caused by a decrease in cortical dopamine. In other words, the weight of evidence suggests that cannabis produces cognitive blunting rather than reducing anxiety, indifference rather than relaxation and amotivation rather than inner peace, all of which are closer to psychopathology than well-being. Civil cases do not have to go through the court system and can be dealt with by the courts.1 Although records may be kept by a court, they are not criminal records and do not affect employment, accommodation or travel opportunities. The main difference with a criminal model is that, in a decriminalized model, although penalties still apply to drug use and possession, they are no longer criminal charges. Another crucial difference between the decriminalization and legalization of opioids is that users and heroin addicts are required to get their daily solution from the black market, where the drug they get is most likely often falsified along with the stronger, more deadly fentanyl, which is responsible for more than eighty percent of unintentional overdose deaths in America. Simply decriminalizing small amounts of possession may avoid arrest or imprisonment, but that`s if you survive the use of opioids purchased on the black market.
The only way to protect American boys and girls from the black market would be to allow them to buy the drug they want in a pharmacy where they would know what they are getting, the pharmaceutical drug, the best should be that no prescription is required. You don`t need a script for other drugs you can kill, like aspirin, Tylenol, tobacco, alcohol, to name a few. The U.S. Constitution authorizes the government, not Congress, not to dictate what you own, grow, plant, maintain, harvest, take, drink, inject, or inhale, and the Ninth Amendment refers to the rights you retain that are not listed. Around the world, the drug policy landscape is changing. In this article, we hope to explain what the difference is between decriminalization, prohibition, and legalization, with examples of countries that have adopted alternatives to the ban, such as Portugal and Canada. This article will shed light on the definitions of these terms and their importance for drug policy. „With decriminalization, there may not be a criminal sanction, but a civil penalty, such as a fine, could still apply,“ he says.
„Decriminalization is actually a scale of the level of civil and legal penalties that apply to the possession or sale of a substance.“ The differences between legalization and decriminalization are something that often confuses students. Finally, the prefix „of“ gives the impression that an action is no longer illegal, which could be misunderstood as „legal“. However, in legal terminology, „illegal“ is actually different from „criminal“ and would therefore represent a different view of the issue of legalization versus decriminalization. As the debate about „legalization“ and „decriminalization“ progresses, the terms are often misused interchangeably. However, there is more than one semantic difference between the two. Legalization would mean that one can possess or use the drug in accordance with guidelines and restrictions on marijuana use. Typically, these guidelines are codified by a state law that specifies how much marijuana a person can possess. If, for example, prostitution is decriminalized, it means that more and more people will learn to accept the presence of the industry. A decriminalized act has the possibility of being legalized after a few years. What does all this mean for our country? How will decriminalization efforts affect the ongoing drug epidemic and how will they affect those struggling with addiction? Before answering these questions, it is important to understand what legalization and decriminalization actually entail. Many of you wonder if you want to say the same thing? Recent meta-analyses support the hypothesis that cannabis use contributes to the increased risk of developing schizophrenia.
In a comprehensive and systematic meta-analysis, Moore et al37 determined whether cannabis use contributes causally to the development of non-substantial psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and mood disorders. The study was designed to address as many of the most important methodological issues in studying the link between cannabis use and psychosis: 1) the potential for reverse causality (where psychosis causes cannabis use and not the other way around) and 2) transient intoxication effects (i.e. misinterpreted as psychosis as false positive error). The results showed that the risk of psychosis among cannabis users is increased by about 40% (pooled adjusted OR: 1.41).